ROSUVASTATIN / CRESTOR®

GENERIC NAME ROSUVASTATIN / CRESTOR®

PROPRIETARY NAME CRESTOR® / ASTRAZENECA

FORMULARY RECOMMENDATION

Consider adding based upon its comparative cost to other statin products.

FDA APPROVED INDICATION (1)

As an adjunct to diet to reduce elevated total-C, LDL-C, ApoB, nonHDL-C, and TG levels and to increase HDL-C in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia (heterozygous familial and nonfamilial) and mixed dyslipidemia (Fredrickson type IIa and IIb); as an adjunct to diet for the treatment of patients with elevated serum TG levels (Fredrickson Type IV); and to reduce LDL-C, total-C, and ApoB in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia as an adjunct to other lipid-lowering treatments (e.g., LDL apheresis) or if such treatments are unavailable.

PHARMACOLOGY (1-5)

Rosuvastatin is a potent inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, which is used for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. HMG-CoA reductase is the rate-limiting enzyme in de novo cholesterol synthesis. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors reduce the production of mevalonic acid from HMG-CoA, resulting in a reduction in hepatic cholesterol synthesis. This in turn results in a compensatory increase in the expression of high affinity low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors on hepatocyte membranes and stimulation of LDL catabolism. It is in this manner that rosuvastatin produces the lowering of plasma total and LDL cholesterol levels observed in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Reductions in the hepatic pool of cholesterol has also been associated with a decrease in the rate of production of very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and/or LDL by the liver. The high potency of rosuvastatin relative to other statins probably relates to rosuvastatin's low lipophilicity and high hepatocyte selectivity due to its large polar side chain.

EFFICACY (1-2,5-15)

SUMMARY

Several clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of rosuvastatin as an adjunct to diet for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia (heterozygous familial and nonfamilial) and in the treatment of mixed dyslipidemia (Fredrickson Type IIa and IIb). In these studies rosuvastatin was shown to significantly reduce total-C, LDL-C, nonHDL-C, TG, and ApoB across the dose range and to increase HDL-C. In comparator trials, rosuvastatin has been shown to significantly reduce LDL-C levels compared to atorvastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin. Clinical trials have also demonstrated the effectiveness of rosuvastatin in significantly reducing LDL-C levels in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and in significantly reducing TG levels in patients with hypertriglyceridemia (Fredrickson Type IIb and IV). Outcome data (morbidity and mortality) are lacking.

CONCLUSION (6)

Rosuvastatin is more effective than atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin across dose ranges for the reduction of LDL cholesterol in patients with hypercholesterolemia.

STUDY DESIGN

6-Week, parallel-group, open-label, randomized, multicenter, comparator-controlled clinical trial (n=2,431) (STELLAR Trial).

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Men and nonpregnant women 18 years of age or older with hypercholesterolemia (LDL >=160 and <=250 mg/dl). Triglyceride concentrations were required to be <400 mg/dl.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

History of sensitivity to statins; serious or unstable medical or psychological conditions; history of heterozygous or homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia or familial dysbetalipoproteinemia; use of concomitant medications known to affect the lipid profile or present a potential safety concern; history of drug or alcohol abuse; unexplained increases in creatine kinase to >3 times the upper limit of normal during the dietary lead-in period; ALT, AST, or bilirubin values >=1.5 the upper limit of normal during the dietary lead-in period; and participation in another investigational drug trial within 4 weeks of trial enrollment.

TREATMENT REGIMEN

After a 6-week dietary lead-in period, patients were randomized to receive 6 weeks therapy of once daily (before bedtime) rosuvastatin (10, 20, 40, or 80 mg), atorvastatin (10, 20, 40, or 80 mg), simvastatin (10, 20, 40, or 80 mg), or pravastatin (10, 20, or 40 mg).

RESULTS

At 6 weeks, rosuvastatin 10-80 mg reduced LDL cholesterol by a mean of 8.2%, 26%, and 12%-18% more than atorvastatin 10-80 mg, pravastatin 10-40 mg, and simvastatin 10-80 mg, respectively.

MEAN % CHANGE FROM BASELINE IN LDL CHOLESTEROL

Rosuvastatin Atorvastatin Simvastatin Pravastatin
10 mg          -45.7% 10 mg          -36.8% 10 mg          -28.3% 10 mg          -20.1%
20 mg          -52.4% 20 mg          -42.6% 20 mg          -35% 20 mg          -24.4%
40 mg          -55% 40 mg          -47,8% 40 mg          -38.8% 40 mg          -29.7%
80 mg           ----- 80 mg           -51.1% 80 mg          -45.8%  -----             -----

Mean percent changes in HDL cholesterol in rosuvastatin groups were +7.7% to +9.6% compared with +2.1% to +6.8% in all other groups. Across dose ranges, rosuvastatin reduced total cholesterol 4.7% to 18.7% more than the comparators. Rosuvastatin also reduced triglycerides significantly more than simvastatin and pravastatin. In addition, National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel III LDL cholesterol goals were achieved by 82% (10 mg) to 89% (both 20 mg and 40 mg) of rosuvastatin patients and 69% (10 mg), 75% (20 mg), 85% (40 mg), and 82% (80 mg) of atorvastatin patients. The difference was not statistically different between atorvastatin and rosuvastatin except for the 20 mg doses (89% and 75%, respectively).

SAFETY

Overall, all treatments were well-tolerated with pain, pharyngitis, myalgia, and headache the most common adverse events reported.

CONCLUSION (1)

Rosuvastatin is effective in the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia.

STUDY DESIGN

6-Week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled dose-response clinical trial (n=126).

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Patients with hypertriglyceridemia (baseline TG levels of 273 to 817 mg/dl).

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Not specified.

TREATMENT REGIMEN

Patients were randomized to receive rosuvastatin (5, 10, 20, or 40 mg) as a single daily dose or placebo.

RESULTS

Rosuvastatin significantly reduced serum TG levels compared to placebo with a median percent change from baseline of –21%, -37%, -37%, -43%, for 5 mg, 10 mg, 20 mg, 40 mg doses, respectively, compared to a 1% increase for placebo.

SAFETY

Not specified.

PHARMACOKINETICS (1-2,16-19)

 

Rosuvastatin

Atorvastatin

Simvastatin

Absolute bioavailability

20%

12%

< 5%

Protein binding

88%

98%

95%

Volume of distribution

134 L

565 L

---

Metabolism

Minimal hepatic metabolism. The major metabolite is N-desmethyl rosuvastatin (active) via CYP450 2C9. Greater than 90% of activity is due to rosuvastatin. Clearance is not significantly dependent on CYP450 3A4.

Hydrolyzed by liver (CYP450 3A4)

Hydrolyzed by liver (CYP450 3A4)

Excretion

Feces(90%)

Urine(10%)

Feces

Urine (2%)

Feces(60%)

Urine (13%)

Half-life

19 hours

14 hours

---

CONTRAINDICATIONS (1)

WARNINGS (1)

ADVERSE EFFECTS (1)

(Most common, 2-9%)

DRUG INTERACTIONS (1)

DOSE (1)

INITIAL DOSE

For hypercholesterolemia and mixed dyslipidemia, 10 mg orally once daily. Consider 5 mg orally once daily for patients requiring less aggressive LDL-C reductions or who are at risk for myopathy. Consider 20 mg orally once daily for patients with marked hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C > 190 mg/dL). For homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, 20 mg orally once daily.

USUAL DOSE

5 to 40 mg orally once daily in conjunction with a standard cholesterol-lowering diet.

MAXIMUM RECOMMENDED DOSE

40 mg orally once daily.

DOSE ADJUSTMENT

After initiation, lipid levels should be analyzed within 2 to 4 weeks and dosage adjusted accordingly. For patients with creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) not on hemodialysis, the starting dose should be 5 mg once daily and not to exceed 10 mg once daily. When used in combination with gemfibrozil, the dose should not exceed 10 mg once daily. When used in combination with cyclosporine, the dose should not exceed 5 mg once daily.

COST (AWP) *

GENERIC NAME

BRAND NAME

MANUFACTURER

STRENGTH **

COST PER MONTH

Rosuvastatin

Crestor

AstraZenica

5 mg tablets-30

$ 75.60

     

10 mg tablets-30

$ 75.60

     

20 mg tablets-30

$ 75.60

     

40 mg tablets-30

$ 75.60

Atorvastatin

Lipitor

Pfizer

10 mg tablets-30

$ 71.57

     

20 mg tablets-30

$ 109.31

     

40 mg tablets-30

$ 109.31

     

80 mg tablets-30

$ 109.31

Fluvastatin

Lescol

Novartis

20 mg capsules-30

$ 53.42

     

40 mg capsules-30

$ 53.42

 

LescolXL

Novartis

80 mg extended-release tablets-30

$ 68.43

Lovastatin

Mevacor

Merck

10 mg tablets-30

$ 44.85

     

20 mg tablets-30

$ 79.10

     

40 mg tablets-30

$ 142.38

Lovastatin

lovastatin

Geneva

10 mg tablets-30

$ 40.32

     

20 mg tablets-30

$ 71.11

     

40 mg tablets-30

$ 128.00

Pravastatin

Pravachol

BMS

20 mg tablet-30

$ 92.41

     

40 mg tablet-30

$ 135.61

     

80 mg tablet-30

$ 135.61

Simvastatin

Zocor

Merck

5 mg tablets-30

$ 58.84

     

10 mg tablets-30

$ 78.85

     

20 mg tablets-30

$ 137.56

     

40 mg tablets-30

$ 137.56

     

80 mg tablets-30

$ 137.56

*AWP may not accurately represent the actual pharmacy cost because wide contractual variations exist among institutions.

** Cost calculations are based on once daily administration.

CONCLUSION/COMMENTS

Rosuvastatin is a selective HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor that has demonstrated efficacy as an adjunct to diet for the treatment of various lipid disorders including primary hypercholesterolemia, mixed dyslipidemia, and isolated hypertriglyceridemia. Studies have demonstrated that rosuvastatin provides superior LDL-C reduction compared to atorvastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin, but comparative data regarding its effects on overall mortality and coronary events are not available. Rosuvastatin appears to exhibit a favorable pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile, which includes low lipophilicity, high hepatocyte selectivity, along with minimal metabolism and limited cytochrome P-450 interactions. However, until more data are available, cost will be an important consideration in the selection of statin therapy. The use of 80 mg was stopped due to rhabdomyolysis and renal impairment during trials. The myotoxic potential (myopathy) of rosuvastatin 10 mg to 40 mg is similar to other statins. Recommendations for liver function test monitoring are similar with most other statins. Due to concerns regarding renal toxicity (proteinuria), the manufacturer will conduct postmarketing surveillance to assess any link between rosuvastatin and kidney problems. Additional studies include an atherosclerosis regression trial, an intervascular ultrasound study, outcome studies, a study in patients with renal failure on dialysis, and a study in patients with elevated C-reactive protein.

REFERENCES

  1. Product Information: Crestor®, rosuvastatin. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, DE (revised 08/2003) reviewed 09/2003.
  2. McTaggart F, Buckett L, Davidson R et al: Preclinical and clinical pharmacology of rosuvastatin, a new 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87(suppl):28B-32B.
  3. Istvan ES & Deisenhofer J: Structural mechanism for statin inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase. Science 2001; 292:1160-1164.
  4. Buckett L, Ballard P, Davidson R et al: Selectivity of ZD4522 for inhibition of cholesterol synthesis in hepatic versus non-hepatic cells (abstract). Atherosclerosis 2000; 151:41.
  5. Olsson AG: A new statin: a new standard. Clin Cardiol 2001; 24(Suppl 111):18-23.
  6. Jones PH, Davidson MH, Stein EA et al: Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin across doses (STELLAR Trial). Am J Cardiol 2003; 92:152-160.
  7. Davidson M, Ma P, Stein EA et al: Comparison of effects on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin in patients with type IIa or IIb hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol 2002;89:268-275.
  8. Olsson AG, Southworth H, Wilpshaar JW: Long-term efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin: Results of a 52-week comparator-controlled trial versus atorvastatin (abstract). Eur Heart J 2001; 22(Suppl):253.
  9. Brown WV, Zedler BK, Bays HE et al: Long-term efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin: Results of a 52-week comparator-controlled trial versus pravastatin and simvastatin (abstract). Eur Heart J 2001; 22(Suppl):270.
  10. Stein E, Strutt KL, Miller E, Southworth H: ZD4522 is superior to atorvastatin in the treatment of patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (abstract). J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37(Suppl):292A. Abstract 1261-176.
  11. Hunninghake DB, Chitra RR, Simonson SG, Schneck DW: Rosuvastatin markedly improved the atherogenic lipid profile in hypertriglyceridemic patients (abstract). Eur Heart J 2001; 22(Suppl):270.
  12. Shepherd J, Hunninghake DB, Barter P et al: Guidelines for lowering lipids to reduce coronary artery disease risk: A comparison of rosuvastatin with atorvastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin for achieving lipid-lowering goals. Am J Cardiol 2003; 91(Suppl):11C-19C.
  13. Brewer HB: Benefit-risk assessment of rosuvastatin 10 to 40 milligrams. Am J Cardiol 2003; 92(Suppl 2):23-29.
  14. Anon: First GALAXY results build Crestor profile. SCRIP No. 2839, April 9, 2003, p.25. PJB Publications.
  15. Anon: AstraZeneca Crestor Renal monitoring recommended by advisory cmte. The Pink Sheet July 14, 2003; 65(28).
  16. McTaggart F, Buckett L, Davidson R et al: Preclinical and clinical pharmacology of rosuvastatin, a new 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87(Suppl):28B-32B.
  17. Warwick MJ, Dane AL, Raza A et al: Single-and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and safety of the new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor ZD4522 (abstract). Atherosclerosis 2000; 151:39.
  18. Product Information: Lipitor®, atorvastatin. Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, (PI revised 4/2002) reviewed 8/2002.
  19. Product Information: Zocor®, simvastatin. Merck & Co., Inc., Whiteshouse Station, NJ, (PI revised 5/2002) reviewed 7/2002.

Published October 2003. Content based on medical literature and product information available at that time.